Guidelines for Writing and Evaluating Proposals

Submitted to the Education Committee,

ACBL Unit 143 Board

Approved 2/13 /08

Education Committee Chair: Ed Hale

 Colleagues:   Jane Ettelson

    Daryl Fisher

    Lee Hastings

    Jennifer Luner

Unit 143 is interested in promoting and expanding the playing of duplicate bridge in the St. Louis area, especially at its sectional and regional tournaments. To help accomplish this goal it is desirable to teach players who are new to bridge and/or duplicate bridge to play duplicate bridge. Grants to fund appropriate bridge teaching proposals and projects which promote the above objectives may be awarded, but there is limited funding. Such grants are intended as an investment in the future of the Unit and are not outright gifts. Some form of payback to the Unit must be indicated in all proposals. Proposals can be submitted anytime. However, it is likely to take at least two months for a funding decision on a project to begin in the new calendar year (winter semester) and longer at other times.

Proposals should be sent to the Chairman of the Education Committee, currently Edward Hale (email ehale@mst.edu).

Any proposal must indicate the proposer, the project, and funding in detail. Items which must be included are:

1. A Bridge teacher resume @ of proposer - Submit a bridge teacher resume.  Include teaching accreditation classes taken, instructor = s playing experience and other items requested on the Online Teacher application available on the ACBL web site.
2. Students - How many students and how many classes?
3. Where lessons will be taught - Indicate facilities where classes will be held.
4. Procedures to be used - Indicate the book(s) to be used and other course materials, if any.
5. Time frame - Indicate the length and duration of the class and any plans for continuation.
6. Budgetary details - Indicate what funding you would like and how the funds will be spent.
7. Return on investment - Estimate how Unit should realize return on its investment for most, if not all funding.

Some special items must be met:

The instructor needs to have taken an appropriate teacher accreditation course.  For example, if the course will be based on Easybridge!, the instructor needs to submit evidence of Easybridge! accreditation. Similarly, for the Better Bridge program.  Also, valuable is accreditation for taking the ACBL TAP (Teacher Accreditation Program) course.

Funding of proposals is to increase duplicate bridge playing at tournaments in the Unit.  Thus, students need to be new to duplicate bridge and funding is not for current duplicate players, who are mainly interested in improving their bridge skills. In addition, there needs to be a relatively long-term commitment of the instructor since it normally takes several semesters for most players to get to a tournament competitive level.

Estimates of return of Unit investment can be based on portion of annual ACBL membership dues returned to the Unit; estimated playing fees to be paid at future sectionals and regionals; or other income to the Unit. Thus, joining the ACBL should be strongly encouraged and application forms should be readily available during classes.

Funding could include supplies needed to get a course started.  For example, Book I of the Easybridge! series or paper supplies needed to run ACBL sanction games, such as convention cards or travelers.